Sunday, 16 February 2014

Peer Review of Arts Challenge-Unit 1

Thank you to Elizabeth (the editor for the short film) for reviewing my arts award.

Peer review of arts challenge: Your ability to keep to your original plan and time manage is astounding. Although your challenge was very researched based and there wasn't too much scope for evidence-taking your blog is really cogent and the efforts you have taken are clear to see, including a bibliography especially. I enjoyed that you focused on particular women producer (who i'd have otherwise never heard of!) and really delved deep into all aspects of the challenge.

Review Project -Unit 2

I am very pleased with the result of the film I made in my group after seeing it filmed. I think that the edit and the music all tied in very well together. The  film ended up being a little shorter than expected by about 20 seconds, but that was not a problem in the slightest. The day I found the most stressful was definitely the editing day, as I found that everybody  had opinions, but what we really needed was one person just to get on with it, otherwise there were too many disagreements, so nothing got done. It was also the day that the time pressure got to us the most, as we were quite well prepared for the filming, but we had made very few plans for the editing, therefor  we were going in only with the script and a vague idea of what we were doing. 
The outcome was however better than anything we expected. This was the general consensus of the group when we reviewed it together on Facebook.
So overall, everyone who posted was happy, focusing on the final outcome over the run up. I have posted asking if there are any comments about specific days, but we will have to wait and see if anyone had anything to day about that, I will update.
When discussing how everyone did in each role, we were all very diplomatic, as well as seemingly less effective at commenting.
Starting with the director:
I would stand by my comment and say you could tell very well that Abdil had done a shot list, even if we did not exactly stick to it, and had everything planned out in his head. On the shoot day he was very efficient, as well as good to listening to other peoples comments. The only criticism would be that we weren't always sure what he was thinking or doing on shoot day when we weren't directly next to him, and it would be good to be kept updated. That is only a small niggle though.

The script writer:
I have to say, he handled our changes of ideas and plot really well, considering we left him with such vague outlines after every meeting. He did pull out aspects of the story and changed our ideas subtly to make the story very much his own. His script was simple and clear, which was what we needed, and well written. Keeping the dialogue minimal was fantastic and made the shoot easier. I did find I needed to massacre his characters frequently though to keep the actor count down.

The cinematographer:
Although very reticent at early stages and didn't really give many initial ideas, his confidence grew in the group until he was quite happy telling us each exactly what he thought. This was very helpful on the shoot day when he gave us many ideas and got really involved. On the editing day he may have tried to get too involved. but backed off by the end to let the editor get on with it. 

The editor:
I concur with the group  and agree that the editor managed to pull together all the shots very well and create a very professional outcome. I was really impressed. In the run up she suggested plenty of ideas and was very good at pulling out things she had seen that we could reference and think about. 

I can honestly say I really enjoyed my experience working with all these people, and would love to work with any of them again if the opportunity arose. 
Finally what they said of me. I will actually start by reviewing my self. I think I was fairly organised, but could have done better at reminding people to do things earlier and keep up to date as to what was going on at every point. I think I allowed myself to get out of the loop occasionally and forget what other people didn't know, causing confusion, for example I showed people the prospective setting a little late so the director had to re-evaluate over night.
I also think I could have done better in making sure the script was sent off to places in time and ready in time. I think I could have worked more closely with the script writer to make sure he was not struggling.
Apart from that I think I did OK. I managed to stop the conversation straying too much and arrange an meeting outside the course to get everything in order before the shoot.
Here is what the others thought of me:
I am glad to see that they were all very kind about me.
I hope this is a sufficient review of the entire project. Thanks for sticking through and reading about it. I have had the best of times.







Thursday, 13 February 2014

Research Profile on Future Pathways- Unit 1

This research profile on future pathways may be a bit convoluted as the truth is I am not sure what I want to do. The BFI academy made me decide I would quite like to work in film. It also made me realize that there is a very wide breath of different roles within film making not making my choice any easier.

In the very short term I have applied for the BFI academy craft residential putting producer or production designer as my two choices. Hopefully this will give me more experience so help clarify what I want to be.

Firstly I am going to York University to study History. There is a student TV station there called York TV, which gives you the opportunity to 'get your face on a screen, try out your skills behind a camera, or have a brilliant idea for a show'. The station won the Best Technical Award for a student TV  in 2013, which seems quite good to me, and they say that people of any experience can get involved.
There is also the Asthetica film festival in York, which another University in York is involved in, but I see no reason why I couldn't email to see if there was any opportunity to help out or things like that.
There is also a more minor film making society that aims to produce short films. That would also be something to get involved with. As well as this there is the opportunity to get involved in Drama Societies, backstage hopefully.

After University I will have to focus on what I want to do next, which is scary. As I have taken an Art Foundation, I could potentially get into film through going on to take some sort of art course and specialize in Film making. Most schools of art, such as Glasgow, seem to offer going down the art film root. This is a possibility, but may be too expensive, as it would be nearly completely starting university again.

If I do want to continue with university education, I could apply to the National Film and Theater School to do a diploma or a masters. They often take people who already have some experience, and often who already have a degree, but wish to learn more. I would have to build up more of a portfolio of work while studying history to apply. There I could study anything from Directing animation to Screenwriting, though I may focus more on the producing and production design courses.

I could choose to study further abroad, such as in America, which has may different film courses such as in New York, however this would work out so expensive it is quite an unrealistic expectation.

If I leave university after doing history and decide I want to go straight out there, I can apply too apprenticeships, perhaps at a TV station such as ITV or the BBC. With that though I would have to stay on the ball and keep checking what come up.

Furthermore I could attempt to throw myself straight into a job at somewhere, probably attempting to get a fairly low down job and working my way up. This is how Alison Owen seemed to manage to get into producing. Otherwise I could try and succeed by becoming particularly skilled in one department of film making while at University, then use the many times mentioned 'transferable skills' I should get from studying history to try and get more work in the department I specialize in.

I feel quite unsure about this as I am wary of committing myself and saying that THIS THING is what I want to to. Overall I think in the immediate future I should just try and get involved as much as possible in film making opportunities around me to get a better idea of where I want to go in the future. I can do this by checking the South Yorkshire Filmmakers Network to see if opportunities jump up, and by continuing to explore film making in my own time with friends or animation in a group or on my own.
Bibliography
http://ystv.co.uk/about/
http://nftsfilm-tv.ac.uk/our-courses/masters
http://www.yusu.org/activities/societies/946
http://www.gsa.ac.uk/
http://www.digital-apprentice.co.uk/events/
http://www.itvjobs.com/working-here/apprenticeships/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/careers/trainee-schemes/apprenticeships
http://www.nyfa.edu/g-landing/filmmaking.php?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=cpc&Keyword=film%20school&Ad=25830828844&utm_content=type&Campaign=FilmSchool(USAOnly)New-FilmSchool&gclid=CIyKitb3yLwCFWfLtAodADgA_w
https://www.syfn.org/

Wednesday, 29 January 2014

Review of Arts Challenge- Unit 1

Overall I have found the research a lot harder and more time consuming than expected. I consistently went over the time limits I imposed on each research section meaning i spent closer to 16 hours doing the challenge rather than the originally planned 13. This made me realize I did not plan times very effectively and I need to not try and cram in an unmanageable amount into each working session as it makes the work feel harder.

The research on producers in Film, Theater and Music got consistently easier as time went on, as I found that I got very similar information over and over again making it easier to do my research. I also fell into a pattern of how I researched, which made it easier. I found it very interesting how the different fields varied as well. It make me think about which field I would like to work in (mainly film and theater). I found that the initial section of finding out about different types of producers went better than the section zooming in on specific producers as I did not have to make a little informed choice about which producers to choose. It was also more easy to see what a producer does rather than evaluate which is best.

The research on producers really frustrated me at first. I found that my first list of looking at producers consisted all of white men, which really bored me. I changed the style of my research in an attempt to get more diversity for the next session, but found it didn't change the landscape much, which frustrated me more. The lack of success I met meant I had to change my plan significantly so it was less of an unmanageable task. Looking at just the 2 producers made me happiest as I could engineer it to be two women, the gender I hadn't looked at yet, though unfortunately it wasn't very multicultural. I liked looking at the variety of ways people had managed to make it into producing, though I would have been interested in finding out more about the early life of one of my female producers, but it appears she keeps the information under tight wraps.

Overall I have enjoyed my research on producers and it has greatly informed me on what they actually do, something I had no knowledge on when I started the BFI academy course. It made me consider it as a possible path. It was also nice looking at success stories. I may like to go away and look a little bit at failures at producing to see their career path and why it all went wrong.

Friday, 10 January 2014

Two Producers- Unit 1

I have been looking up two producers. I decided to look up two women as I haven't yet mentioned any female producers. They are also both British. Interestingly, one it was really hard to find out anything personal about like where she was born, and the other it was mostly personal. I chose these two as they have both done films I have enjoyed. These are my notes.

Nira Park
Nira Park
Big talk productions logo
Park says she wrote to a comedy company called ComicStrip until they let her join in 1989. Once in she swept the floor and worked her way up to be production manager while the company shot short comedy films for Channel 4. In June 1995 she left to found Big Talk Productions (website http://www.bigtalkproductions.com/), where she continued working with Channel 4. They teamed her up with director Edgar Wright. Together they made the popular T.V series 'Spaced'.                                                           A multi-tasker, Park was working on several T.V projects when Edgar Wright started trying to push forward a film idea called 'Shaun of the Dead', so she left the other projects to work on financing the film project full time. After a time Working Title agreed to finance the project. Park formed alliances with them and they still work together.                                                                     'Shaun of the Dead' (website http://www.focusfeatures.com/shaun_of_the_dead)  was released in 2004 and became her and Wrights break through piece. Park went on to produce the entire Cornetto Trilogy with Wright, Pegg and Frost as well as breaking into the American market to produce 'Scott Pilgrim vs. the World' (website http://www.universalstudiosentertainment.com/scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world/).                                                                                                                                              
'Spaced' which ran from 1999-2001
 Her work has won the audience award at SXSW festival and she was named one to watch by Varity magazine in 2005 and won Producer of the year in 2010 at the Women in Film and Television awards. Big Talk productions remains a action/ horror/ comedy production company, but pushed the boat out a bit in 2013 when they did a psychological thriller.
Alison Owen
Alison Owen
Ruby Film and Television logo
Owen started out reading English Literature at University College London. She volunteered on student films at the National Film School to gain experience then used the 'Music Video boom' to become a music video producer for MTV.       She went on to work for limelight film and video, where agents heard she was making films and sent her 'doss' scripts. She impressed them by giving feedback on them all.                                                                                                                                    
Jane Eyre 2011, produced by Ruby
Film and Television
 At a short film festival Owen saw a film which she liked and rang up the creators agent and got in contact to create her first feature film, 'Hear my Song' 1991. She went on to create Ruby Film and Television (website http://www.rubyfilms.co.uk/  which works with ITV in production and distribution and produced the BAFTA winning film 'Elizabeth' (1998) (website http://www.universalstudiosentertainment.com/elizabeth-the-golden-age/). She has gone on to produce many films and T.V films. Most recently she produced 'Saving Mr Banks' (2013) (Website http://movies.disney.com/saving-mr-banks) which she says came about after deciding to do an Australian-British co-production.

These are my two producers. It took me a long time to find the information on Nira Park as she seems to mainly only talk about the project she is currently doing, and never mentions anything like if she went to university. I cant even find out how old she was when she started at ComicStrip. Overall I have really enjoyed learning about these two producers. They seem to differ from a lot of producers I have already looked at in that they have never been actors or directors. They both worked their way up to being film producers through working in T.V and meeting the right people. I really enjoyed reading about both of them.

Bibliography




Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom- Review

Director-Justin Chadwick
2013

Following Nelson Mandala's biography, the film follows Mandala from being a promising young lawyer to becoming a 'terrorist' to prison through to becoming president.




This was without a doubt an effecting film. It made me think about how South Africa only really stopped apartheid the year before I was born. However I think my mum, who I went to see this with got quite a bit more out of it than me. I knew the basics of Mandela's life like most people, whereas my mum lived at the time and took interest. Unfortunately, though a good film, this meant that a large proportion of the film seemed quite confusing to me. 10 years could be summed up in a couple of minutes, big events, personal and political were only skated over. I didn't find out what the group that Mandela is recruited to at the start was until very close to the end.
I think that the film was trying to cover so much information, it didn't bother explaining many things which is all good and well for those who know quite a bit about Nelson Mandela, but those who know less could be left a bit in the dark. This film celebrates a great mans life rather than informs the viewer about it.
Another symptom of the attempt to rush through so many important events was that the camera seemed to zoom around at an incredible speed. Every cut and scene seemed to be incredibly short, the bear minimum that got the point across.
This is not to say it didn't interest me. I was captivated, and needed to use all my mental energy to keep up, so I certainly wasn't wandering. The performances were all fantastic and sympathetic. It was lovely to watch. There were no dud moments as far as I am aware.
I think possibly something like a T.V series exploring Mandela's life may have been more informative, as there were a lot of facts I wanted to know, like who was the man who was arrested with Mandela who was obviously considered white? The film certainly whet my appetite to find out more.
Overall I really enjoyed the film, I just didn't manage to glean as much information as to what was actually going on. I feel the film only scraped the surface. However that is fair enough considering how much they had to cover in such a short time.

A Producer from 6 Continents- Unit 1

After the difficulties of yesterday, this turned out too be a much more manageable task. First I quickly realized that Antarctica don't really have a film industry, so it would be difficult to find an antarctic producer. I also found out that Oceania and Australia are really tied together in film and much more. So that puts us on 6 producers. The initial stage of finding one producer that is worth researching was the first difficulty, but I think it got easier. Here are my notes. 
So here are the people I found.

Africa
During the colonial period, Africa was portrayed as having little history, just as a generally exotic place, with notable exceptions such as 'Les Statues Meurant Aussi'. After the colonial period more films were made that explored African heritage and stories. In Nigeria cinema really took off with a value of about $3.5 billion and the nickname 'Nollywood'. Most films made in Nollywood remain straight to video.                                                                                 One notable producer is Teco Benson. He started out as an actor in 1994, but quickly became involved in writing, directing, editing and production. His film 'Explosion' represented Nollywood in Israel in 2006.

Asia
Indian film and Bollywood are among the biggest film producers in the world. However after hearing about the rise in Chinese cinema, I thought I may research that. It was after the second world war when cinema was under Japanese control that Chinese cinema began to flourish. Now it is also one of the biggest film industries in the world, in 2013 their gross box being worth $3.6 billion.             Run Run Shaw seems to be a prominent name in the industry. After opening a chain of cinemas in China and Malaysia, he started producing films as well as T.V with his brother in a company they called the Shaw Brothers. He became a mogul, on IMDb having his name as producer to 323 credits. He is credited with bringing Kung Fu to the mainstream audiences. The project  that he was involved in that most western people will recognize is 'Blade Runner' (1982).

North America
American cinema is the most well known to the average British cinema goer. Its film industry has been dubbed Hollywood, and is the 3rd most prolific creator of films after Bollywood and India.                                  I have chosen to mention Steven Spielberg again as he is the highest grossing producer in recent USA cinema. at $6,468.3 million. He started out as a director, creating classics such as 'Jaws'. He founded Dreamworks studio with Stacey Snider. He continues to be a director and be involved in a high number of cinema releases.



South America
In the early 1940's and 1950's Latin American films were popular in Hollywood. This popularity has waned slightly, but South America still exports a lot of talent, such as directors Guillermo Del Toro and Alfonzo Curon.                                     A notable producer is Alejandro González Iñárritu. Starting out as a radio host, then moving on to direction. In the 1990's he set up his own production company called Zeta Films. He produced his own films in 2000, and was nominated for an Oscar for 'Babel' (2007). 




Australia/ Oceania
Australia was quick off the mark in creating film. It boomed in the 1910's only to decline in the 1920's. It slowly built itself up, but not back to the same level, finding it hard to compete with American film, as most English speaking countries do. Many of its stars such as Cate Blanchett defect to Hollywood.                                                                                                    One producer is Antony I. Ginnane. He stated out studying law, then set up a small distribution company. He is most well known for his art house films. He attended Cannes with 'High Tide' in 1987. 



Europe
The Lumiere brothers disputably created film in Europe. As I am British I am going to focus on British cinema in this section. The Golden age was the 1940's with British films very popular around the world. Britain continues to have a fairly respectable output, managing to produce Blockbusters such as 'James Bond' and 'Harry Potter'.                           I am going to look at David Heyman, who struck gold in managing to be producer for the 'Harry Potter' franchise. He started out as a production assistant, then became a producer, founding Heyday Films. He has other big films on his hands such as 'The Boy in the Striped Pajamas' (2008) and 'Gravity' (2013).

So these are some Producers from around the world. I notice the domination of white men again, but not exclusively this time. I may have to work on getting a female producer into this blog. As per the trend, this took me longer than expected (by about half an hour) but I found it less stressful than last time because my aim was more precise, so it was easier to look when I knew what I was looking for. I think next time I am going to zoom in on the lives of two producers, and hopefully one of them will be female. I will probably choose two British producers.

Thank you for reading.

Bibliography